If you wanted to buy something and had two differently priced alternatives to choose from, will you simply go ahead and pick the cheaper one? You would probably like to compare their prices vis-Ã -vis their benefits before selecting one. You would then pick the one that provides the greatest value for the given price. A similar cost-benefit analysis is performed when shopping for stocks. Investors like to know what benefits they will receive for the price they are paying for them. Fortunately, the benefits of owning stocks are quantifiable, unlike the features of other products you might buy. These benefits are in the form of a share in the future income, cash flows or dividends of the company; as well as in the form of a share in its assets or book value. To calculate the cost-benefit trade-off, the price of the stock is divided by these values. The ratios thus calculated are called price multiples. These multiples are then compared across similar companies to discover which of them offers the greatest value. Since this approach is based on a comparison between different companies, it is called the relative value approach. The idea here is that in an efficient market, share prices reflect company fundamentals perfectly. If there is inconsistency between the two, investors will spot them quickly and prices will soon appreciate to reflect what fundamentals warrant.
Traditionally, many price multiples are used for stock-picking. They include: price-to-sales (PS), price-to-cash flows (PCF) and price-to-dividends. However, the ones used the most are price-to-earnings (PE) and price-to-book value (PB). Letâ€™s look at these individually.
The PE ratio is calculated by dividing the market price per share of a company with its earnings per share (EPS). EPS is the proportion of net income that can be theoretically allocated equally to each individual share. It is calculated by dividing net income by the number of shares outstanding. As such, EPS is essentially net income per share. It may be historical or forward, based on whether it is calculated using previous periodâ€™s earnings or the next oneâ€™s. Since current prices are a function of expected future earnings, investors prefer calculating forward PEs. In case a companyâ€™s forward earnings are unpredictable for some reason, historical PEs are used.
Forward PE calculates the price an investor effectively has to pay for each rupee of future earnings of the company. Net income belongs to shareholders of the company, whether it pays it out as dividend or retains and reinvests it in the future, thereby leading to an increase in future dividends. This is why investors want to know exactly how much they are paying for each unit of earnings. Smaller the price, the better it is for investors.
One limitation of price multiples based on flow variables, such as net income and cash flows, is that they are volatile. It is possible for these variables to be very high in one period and negative in the next. A volatile or negative denominator doesnâ€™t make a meaningful multiple. To cope with this, investors sometimes use balance sheet figures as they are more stable and predictable. The figure used most commonly is the book value. As discussed in the section on the balance sheet, book value is the total value of the companyâ€™s equity. It includes the face value of its shares, retained earnings, certain reserves and comprehensive incomes that escape the income statement and go directly to the balance sheet. As in the case of EPS, book value too is converted into a per share form by dividing it by the number of outstanding shares. The current share price is then divided by this value to calculate PB. As with PE and all other price multiples, a low value for PB is considered better because it means that the investor is required to pay less per unit book value.
The trouble with using multiples is that a low price multiple doesnâ€™t always indicate a good investment opportunity. Sometimes, it is a true reflection of poor company fundamentals. Similarly, a high multiple is also sometimes justified. For instance, if a company is investing in a new facility or undertaking another venture that will lead to a major boost in future earnings, a high PE may be warranted. Similarly, a very low PE may also be justified by certain factors. This calls for further investigation. In the following segment, we will discuss certain ratios that are used for this investigation.
Equity holders are principally concerned about the recovery of their investment, along with the dividend due on it. To verify the safety of their investments and ascertain its growth potential, they seek answers to four questions:
These questions are answered by calculating four categories of ratiosâ€”profitability, liquidity, efficiency and risk (coverage) ratios. Companies that perform well along these parameters generally have justifiably high price multiples.
Profitability ratios: These ratios seek to measure the profitability of a company based on measures like gross profit, operating profit, net profit and return on equity. Higher the profitability ratios of a company, the better it is. Commonly used profitability ratios include: - Gross profit margin = Gross profit for the period/ sales revenue for the period - Operating profit margin = Operating profit for the period/ sales revenue for the period - Net profit margin = Net profit for the period/ sales revenue for the period - Return on equity (ROE) = Net profit for the period/ average book value of equity*
Liquidity ratios: These ratios measure whether the company has enough short-term assets to finance its short term liabilities. Recall the discussion on working capital in the section on the income statement. These ratios seek to measure whether the companyâ€™s working capital is positive. A value in excess of one is considered to be good for these ratios. However, a very high value is also not healthy as it indicates overinvestment in working capital. Some popular liquidity ratios are: - Current ratio = current assets/ current liabilities - Quick ratio = (cash + short term investments + accounts receivable)/ current liabilities - Cash ratio = (cash + short term investments)/ current liabilities
Efficiency (activity) ratios: These ratios comment upon the efficiency of a companyâ€™s operations. Efficiency is estimated by how quickly a company can convert its inventory into sales and use this money to repay its suppliers. This process is called the cash conversion cycle. More quickly a company is able to complete this cycle, more will be the number of cycles it will complete in a year and higher will be its revenue. To ascertain this, efficiency at every stage of the cycle â€“ from inventory to sales, from sales to accounts receivables and from accounts receivable to payment to suppliers is measured. As mentioned above, efficiency is measured in two waysâ€”the length of each cycle and the number of cycles completed in the year. The ratios that estimate the first are: - Inventory turnover = COGS/ average inventory*. - Receivables turnover = sales revenue/ average accounts receivable*. - Payables turnover: (COGS +opening inventory balance â€“ closing inventory balance)/ average accounts payable*
The other category of efficiency ratios calculate the number of days it takes for each cycle to get completed. They include: - Days of inventory on hand (DOH) = 365/ inventory turnover ratio. - Days of sales outstanding (DSO) = 365/ receivables turnover ratio. - Number of days of payables (DOP): 365/ payables turnover ratio.
Notice that each of the above ratios evaluates efficiency at one of the stages talked about earlier. Finally, we need to measure the total number of days taken in the completion of the entire cycle. This is done by adding the DOH and DSO and subtracting DOP from it: - Cash conversion cycle: DOH + DSO - DOP
*All averages in the above mentioned formulas are calculated by dividing the sum of opening and closing values of the asset/liability by 2. For example, average book value of equity is the sum of book value at the beginning and the end of the year, divided by 2.
Thus far, we have only discussed the blessings of ratio analysis. A word of caution is in order before we move ahead in this section. Following are some of the limitations of ratio analysis.
Value investing is the style of investing where investors pick stocks that they feel are undervalued or â€˜cheapâ€™, relative to their peers or in light of their own future prospects. This approach contrasts with growth investing, where investors are not much concerned about the price of the stock. They pick stocks that they believe will appreciate because the company will realize exceptional earnings growth in the future.
Value investing is based on the concept of intrinsic value. Intrinsic value is the price investors, in general, feel the companyâ€™s shares should trade at, given its fundamentals. A value investor invests in a stock when its market price is below the intrinsic value because he expects the price to appreciate to intrinsic value over time. Intrinsic value is estimated using price multiples. This is done in two ways:
Assume that a company is trading at a forward PE multiple of 12 while a group of its competitors are trading at an average multiple of 15. This means that for every unit of forward earnings of the company, you have to pay Rs 12, whereas for its competitors, it is Rs 15. since the company is cheaper than its competitors, you may buy it.
For the second approach, letâ€™s assume that the company has an estimated forward EPS of Rs 20 and is currently priced Rs 360 per share. The competitorsâ€™ PE is the same. Now, we can calculate the intrinsic value of the company by multiplying the competitorâ€™s PE with the companyâ€™s EPS. This comes out to Rs 300. Since the market price is above this, you may leave the stock alone.
Instead of using competitorsâ€™ multiples, a comparison can also be made with the historical values of the companyâ€™s own multiples. Further, investors generally like to use a host of multiples rather than just the one to calculate intrinsic value.
As mentioned earlier, investors must not rely on numerical values alone. They must employ their logic and evaluate why the companyâ€™s multiples are different from the industryâ€™s. In some cases, on doing so, they may realize that even a higher multiple for the company is attractive owing to its fundamentals. On other occasions, a much lower price multiple may also not be attractive enough, as the stock may never appreciate owing to limited potential. Investors who get attracted by low price multiples and invest in such stocks may never see them appreciate. This is called the value trap.