On 31 August 2025, Jaguar Land Rover (JLR), a subsidiary of Tata Motors, fell victim to a sophisticated cyberattack that disrupted its global operations. This incident halted production across multiple continents, including the UK, India, Slovakia, and Brazil, and led to significant financial losses. The attack was attributed to the cybercriminal group Scattered Lapsus$ Hunters.
Here is how the cyberattack on Jaguar Land Rover has impacted and will continue to impact Tata Motors and other companies in the automobile sector.
Jaguar Land Rover reported a 24.2% drop in their wholesale sales. The reason is a six-week production disruption caused by a cyberattack in Q2 FY26. The drop in sales was the result of manufacturing stops at key plants, specifically Solihull and Wolverhampton.
Wholesale volumes dropped in all key markets, with the UK being the hardest-hit country. The production disruption also caused issues with its supply chain and delays in deliveries, creating pressure on dealer inventories. Given that JLR accounted for nearly 70% of Tata Motors’ consolidated revenue, the impact is significant.
With Tata still recovering from tariff-related shipment delays, quarterly earnings might shrink.
Following the cyberattack disclosure, Tata Motors’ stock fell nearly 4% on the Bombay Stock Exchange, hitting an intraday low of ₹655.30 on 25 September 2025. The market reacted to fears of prolonged production losses and weakened earnings. Given JLR’s weight in Tata Motors’ portfolio, investor sentiment turned bearish.
This incident shows how operational changes at overseas subsidiaries can cause instant volatility in the parent company’s stock. The share price movement also signals investor concern about cybersecurity safeguards in the automotive sector.
The cyberattack may cost JLR as much as ₹21,000 crore (around £2 billion), which exceeds its projected profit for FY25 after tax of ₹18,900 crore. The projected costs considered lost production, stopped sales, and emergency IT recovery costs.
JLR had been attempting to negotiate cyber insurance but was not able to finalise it prior to being attacked, leaving JLR unprotected from financial losses. The financial implications of the attack could require Tata Motors to restate FY26 earnings guidance downward and/or move capital away from R&D or EV into cybersecurity and recovery efforts after the breach. It also raises the question of risk management practices for Tata Group’s global subsidiaries.
JLR asked its 33,000 employees to stay home as part of the recovery following the cyberattack. The mass shutdown affected work in engineering, production, and logistics. Although the company is beginning a phased restart, it may still take a few weeks to return to full capacity.
The situation shows the vulnerability of many labour-dependent sectors to digital threats. For Tata Motors, the incident raises questions about planning for workforce continuity in the future and the importance of having sound corporate employee communication plans during a crisis.
To stabilise its supply chain, JLR announced upfront cash payments to smaller parts suppliers during the restart phase. Many vendors faced liquidity stress after weeks without orders. This decision is based on the interdependence between OEMs and Tier-1/Tier-2 suppliers.
For Tata Motors, this decision indicates potential short-term cash flow stress and a need to evaluate risk exposure with suppliers. The auto sector may see increased demand for supply chain insurance and digital risk audits post-incident.
The breach has put Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), which manages parts of JLR’s IT infrastructure, under scrutiny. Analysts are questioning whether TCS’s cybersecurity protocols were adequate. This could affect future contracts and client trust. For the Tata Group, reputational risk across verticals—automotive, IT, and engineering—is now amplified. The incident may prompt internal audits and stricter compliance across Tata’s digital ecosystem, with implications for TCS’s enterprise offerings and Tata Motors’ tech stack.
JLR’s engine and battery units were among the last to resume operations. This delay affects Tata Motors’ EV roadmap, especially as JLR is central to its premium EV strategy. The cyberattack disrupted production of electric drivetrains and battery packs, potentially delaying launches and affecting regulatory compliance in emission-sensitive markets. Tata Motors may need to review its EV launch timelines and reallocate resources to secure digital manufacturing systems.
JLR has begun a phased restart of its production following the cyberattack on 8 October 2025, taking an important step towards restoring stability. The company has resumed operations at its Electric Propulsion Manufacturing Centre and Battery Assembly Centre in the UK. Vehicle manufacturing has also resumed at its Solihull and Nitra plants, marking a cautious but crucial step toward restoring normal operations.
The JLR hack serves as a cautionary story for automakers around the world, a growing number of which are using digital systems with increasing reliance. Analysts in the automotive industry warn that inadequate cybersecurity in the auto sector can impact entire value chain operations.
JLR’s gradual production restart offers early signs of recovery, but full normalcy may take time as the company restores systems, reassesses cybersecurity infrastructure, and strengthens digital resilience.
As vehicles become more software-driven, cyber threats extend beyond factories and into connected cars and customer information. Regulators may soon demand software-related audits and other cybersecurity insurance.
Tata Motors and its competitors will need to make their IT infrastructure resilient not just to comply but also to operate.
For traders and investors, the JLR cyberattack signals short-term pressure on Tata Motors’ stock and possible downward revisions in FY26 earnings. The event exposes how digital risks can directly hit production, revenue, and sentiment across the auto sector.
With JLR contributing nearly 70% of Tata Motors’ revenue, this disruption may weaken margins and delay EV plans. Investors might witness increased volatility, especially if supply chain or IT costs rise further.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is not produced by the desk of the Kotak Securities Research Team, nor is it a report published by the Kotak Securities Research Team. The information presented is compiled from several secondary sources available on the internet and may change over time. Investors should conduct their own research and consult with financial professionals before making any investment decisions. Read the full disclaimer here.
Investments in securities market are subject to market risks, read all the related documents carefully before investing. Brokerage will not exceed SEBI prescribed limit. The securities are quoted as an example and not as a recommendation. SEBI Registration No-INZ000200137 Member Id NSE-08081; BSE-673; MSE-1024, MCX-56285, NCDEX-1262.