On July 30, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump announced a sweeping 25% tariff on all imports from India, set to take effect from August 1, 2025. In addition, Washington introduced an unspecified penalty tied to India’s continued purchase of Russian crude oil and military equipment amidst the ongoing war in Ukraine.
These measures signal a major escalation in trade policy, combining economic leverage with direct criticism of India’s energy and defence relationship with Russia.
Earlier in 2025, India and the U.S. had been negotiating a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) aiming to double bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030—codenamed “Mission 500. In April, Trump had issued a “Liberation Day” tariff structure, with a 26% reciprocal tariff on India (compared to 34% for China and 10% minimum baseline tariff).
A 90 day pause on these reciprocal tariffs expired on July 9, 2025. Despite intensifying technical negotiations, no interim deal materialized—prompting growing frustration in Washington. Advisors say Trump sees the tariffs as a tool to “remedy” the stalled negotiations, especially amid India’s resistance on agricultural liberalization, dairy access, and tariff reductions on automobiles and pharmaceuticals.
Trump has explicitly linked the secondary penalty to India’s significant imports of Russian crude oil and arms. India already sourced about a third of its oil from Russia in late 2024, and roughly 38% of its arms imports between 2020–24 were from Russian suppliers.
Washington is framing these penalties as part of its broader effort to curb Russian revenues and force a ceasefire in Ukraine. For instance, Trump warned of secondary tariffs as steep as 100% on buyers of Russian commodities if Russia doesn’t halt hostilities by August 8.
While lawmakers in the U.S. have proposed draconian tariffs—Senator Richard Blumenthal has backed up to 500% tariffs on energy imports from Russia—the broader market remains skeptical that such measures would be implemented fully.
Analysts warn that the 25% tariff, combined with energy-related penalties, could deliver a blow to India's export driven growth model:
The pharmaceuticals and auto sectors, both heavily engaged in U.S. exports, may face disproportionate losses.
India’s electronics manufacturing boom—notably Apple’s production of iPhones—may be jeopardized. Companies have been expanding export capacity from India to the U.S., but current tariffs put this momentum at risk.
India exported approximately $87 billion worth of goods to the U.S. in 2024, making it the largest bilateral trading partner. Meanwhile, U.S. exports to India stood at about $41–45 billion, yielding a trade surplus for India of around $41 billion.
Citi Research projected that India could lose as much as $7 billion in annual export revenue, with an estimated 87% of total exports to the U.S.—worth about $66 billion—subject to tariff exposure.
These U.S. moves signal a broader shift in global strategy:
Washington is increasingly using trade tools to enforce geopolitical objectives—specifically to limit support to Russia by targeting its buyers.
India, long considered a strategic partner via platforms like QUAD and defence cooperation, now finds itself under pressure due to its continued strategic autonomy vis-à-vis Russia. This underscores a tension between Western alignment and India’s multipolar foreign policy model.
Despite pressure, analysts argue India still retains supply chain appeal in global manufacturing diversification efforts—especially as China supply chains remain under intense scrutiny. But India now trades that advantage for exposure to tariff risk.
India’s response will likely involve a calibrated mix of:
Intensified trade negotiations, possibly seeking carve-outs or exemptions for critical sectors.
Diversifying energy suppliers—from sources like Guyana, Canada and Brazil—in order to reduce reliance on Russian crude The Times of India.
Strategic diplomacy to frame its Russia ties as based on national energy security and longstanding defence partnerships.
New Delhi has already emphasized that any trade deal must be mutually beneficial—“work for both countries”—and cautioned against premature assumptions of concessions.
President Trump’s enforcement of a 25% tariff on Indian goods, effective August 1, 2025, coupled with an additional penalty tied to India’s purchases from Russia, marks a significant escalation in U.S. trade and geopolitical strategy. Rising concerns in India’s export sectors, particularly pharmaceuticals, autos, and electronics, underline the potential economic impact.
As New Delhi navigates between strategic autonomy and economic clout in its ties with the United States, the coming weeks could be critical. Whether through new concessions or diversification, India must adapt swiftly to mitigate trade shocks, while preserving its energy and national security choices.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. It is not produced by the desk of the Kotak Securities Research Team, nor is it a report published by the Kotak Securities Research Team. The information presented is compiled from several secondary sources available on the internet and may change over time. Investors should conduct their own research and consult with financial professionals before making any investment decisions. Read the full disclaimer here.
Investments in securities market are subject to market risks, read all the related documents carefully before investing. Brokerage will not exceed SEBI prescribed limit. The securities are quoted as an example and not as a recommendation. SEBI Registration No-INZ000200137 Member Id NSE-08081; BSE-673; MSE-1024, MCX-56285, NCDEX-1262.