Inflows into equity funds via the systematic investment plan (SIP) route fell from Rs 8,641 crore in March to Rs 8,376 crore in April 2020. This is a 3 per cent fall, so the tendency to stop SIPs has not assumed worrisome proportions yet. But many people have lost their incomes or seen considerable erosion, and many more are worried about the sustainability of future cash flows. So, it is inevitable that such investors will, in the near future, ponder whether to continue their SIPs.
Sanjay Kumar Singh, Business Standard
Experts say if someone has lost his job or seen his income dwindle drastically during the lockdown, it is okay for him to pause or stop SIPs. “It may also be okay if you decide to divert your SIP money towards building an emergency corpus or reducing high-cost debt,” says Vishal Dhawan, chief financial planner, Plan Ahead Wealth Advisors.
It is natural for someone who has lost his job to experience a reduction in his risk appetite. “If the economic situation worsens, such a person may not find another job for a long time. And the value of his equity portfolio may diminish further. Someone who has been hit by one type of risk will experience diminished appetite for another type of risk,” says Avinash Luthria, a Sebi-registered investment advisor and founder, Fiduciaries. Such people, he says, should not try to make up for lost income by taking added risk in the equity markets.
Investors over-allocated to equities may also pause or stop their SIPs. “It is only when risk unfolds that we learn how much of it we are actually capable of taking,” says Swarup Mohanty, chief executive officer, Mirae Asset Investment Managers India. When the going is good, investors convince themselves they have the appetite for a 70-80 per cent allocation to equities, and that they can handle a 50 per cent drop. But problems often come bunched together. “Today there is insecurity on the jobs front and about our health situation. Over and above that, equity holdings have declined in value. When investors are hit on so many fronts simultaneously, they realise they may have over-estimated their risk-taking ability,” says Luthria.
On the other hand, people who still have their jobs, possess an adequate emergency corpus, are not heavily leveraged, and are not over-allocated to equities should continue with their SIPs. “Go by your personal circumstances. The breadwinner in a single-income family who has seen income reduction may be forced to reduce or stop his SIPs. On the other hand, a double-income family that has not taken a hit to its income may well continue with them,” says Dhawan. Such people may even think of increasing their SIPs. With avenues for discretionary expenditures closed, they would have experienced a surge in savings.
For such people, these are the best of times to invest more via the SIP route. “Currently, investors are getting to accumulate funds units at much lower prices than just a few months ago. The more units one accumulates now, the better are one’s chances of creating wealth in the future,” says Mohanty.
Those forced to reduce or stop their SIPs should try to invest as and when they have some surplus. Such investors should make use of the systematic transfer plan (STP) route to get the benefit of rupee-cost averaging.
Finally, do not swing to the other extreme of lowering equity allocation to excessively low levels. “Though it appears improbable today, we could have high inflation in the future. Equities have much better inflation-fighting capability than fixed-income instruments,” says Luthria. Leave untouched any equity allocation you may have made for long-term goals.
Disclaimer: This information is from a third party—Business Standard—offered through a tie-up to Kotak Securities customers. Click here for complete disclaimer.
A few links for further reading
Insecure and uncertain in insurance business as Covid-18 damage claims mount
Insurance companies around the world were sailing smoothly, helped by growth in emerging markets and strong capitalisation. Things changed in late February when markets realised that Covid-19’s impact on insurers could be significant. Insurers are yet to know the full impact of the crisis as governments and regulators nudge them to give moratoriums to policyholders and quickly settle claims too. India’s insurance regulator has set strict deadlines for medical insurers to settle Covid-19 claims. General insurers face damage claims from businesses devastated by the national lockdown to contain the disease. Is insurance secured to survive, Joydeep Ghosh explains
There was a time when pay cuts we see today were a complete no-no; govt and public sector jobs were considered safe, as pay and pensions were both assured. Not any longer, it seems, writes T N Ninan
Quick approval, grace period
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought home the significance of health and life insurance like nothing else earlier. Even those who were blasé about these covers in the past are now looking to buy a new policy or want to enhance the sum insured on their existing ones. Meanwhile, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has been issuing a slew of guidelines to health/general and life insurance companies aimed at easing matters for customers.