The Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (PFRDA) has made two important announcements related to the National Pension System (NPS). One, investors will soon be able to take the systematic investment plan (SIP) route while investing in NPS. Second, those who have made a premature exit from NPS, but have only withdrawn the lump-sum portion, will be allowed to continue with the same NPS account, provided they re-deposit the withdrawn amount.
Sanjay Kumar Singh, Business Standard
Experts view the introduction of SIP mode as a positive development. “Even in NPS, you can invest up to 75 per cent in equities. The SIP mode will allow investors to average out their cost of purchase of units,” says Sumit Shukla, chief executive officer, HDFC Pension Fund Management.
In corporate NPS, money anyway gets deducted from an employee’s salary every month. “Corporate employees who wish to invest the additional Rs 50,000 on which tax deduction is available under Section 80CCD(1B) can do so using the SIP mode. They can make this investment via the online investment facility being provided by the central recordkeeping agency (CRA). Introduction of the SIP mode will also benefit the self-employed and those who are part of the unorganised sector.” Adds Raghvendra Nath, managing director, Ladderup Wealth Management: “Unorganised sector workers will be able to save for retirement in a more disciplined way through the SIP mode.”
Investors will, however, have to bear in mind that a transaction charge is involved each time a person invests in NPS (depending on the route taken). “If each SIP installment is small, then the transaction charge as a percentage of the invested amount could pinch,” says Deepesh Raghaw, founder, PersonalFinancePlan, a Securities and Exchange Board of India-registered investment advisor. If a person has invested through a point of purchase (PoP), the charge is 0.25 per cent of the invested amount, the minimum being Rs 25. A person who joined NPS through a PoP can shift to e-NPS. In that case, there will still be a transaction charge but it will be lower—0.05 per cent of the contributed amount, subject to a minimum of Rs 5. Those who invest via the e-NPS route pay no transaction charge.
On September 23, PFRDA came out with a circular pertaining to people who have made premature withdrawals from NPS. Many of them would have withdrawn the lump-sum part (20 per cent of corpus) while the remaining 80 per cent—the portion that has to be compulsorily annuitised—may still be lying in their NPS account.
Withdrawal of this portion can be deferred by three years.
Many such people belong to working age and don’t need regular pay-outs from an annuity. Some may feel they made the wrong decision by exiting prematurely. Yet others may miss the tax benefits that NPS provides.
Earlier, they would have to compulsorily buy annuities with 80 per cent of their corpus, and then start a new NPS account if they wished to do so. Now, PFRDA has allowed such people to deposit the lump-sum amount back and continue with their existing NPS account. “Retirement saving is one of the most important elements of financial planning. As it is, the self-employed and those in the unorganised sector are not part of a mandatory retirement saving plan. They should take advantage of this provision and revive their NPS account,” says Nath.
Clarity is awaited on one aspect. “When people exit prematurely from NPS and withdraw 20 per cent of the corpus as lump-sum, no tax is charged on that amount. Now when they put the money back, the earlier withdrawal can no longer be treated as an exit. There could be some tax implication. We will have to await clarity on this,” says Raghaw.
Disclaimer: This information is from a third party—Business Standard—offered through a tie-up to Kotak Securities customers. Click here for complete disclaimer.
A few links for further reading
Insecure and uncertain in insurance business as Covid-18 damage claims mount
Insurance companies around the world were sailing smoothly, helped by growth in emerging markets and strong capitalisation. Things changed in late February when markets realised that Covid-19’s impact on insurers could be significant. Insurers are yet to know the full impact of the crisis as governments and regulators nudge them to give moratoriums to policyholders and quickly settle claims too. India’s insurance regulator has set strict deadlines for medical insurers to settle Covid-19 claims. General insurers face damage claims from businesses devastated by the national lockdown to contain the disease. Is insurance secured to survive, Joydeep Ghosh explains
There was a time when pay cuts we see today were a complete no-no; govt and public sector jobs were considered safe, as pay and pensions were both assured. Not any longer, it seems, writes T N Ninan
Quick approval, grace period
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought home the significance of health and life insurance like nothing else earlier. Even those who were blasé about these covers in the past are now looking to buy a new policy or want to enhance the sum insured on their existing ones. Meanwhile, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) has been issuing a slew of guidelines to health/general and life insurance companies aimed at easing matters for customers.